Michigan Judge Dismisses DOJ Voter Roll Lawsuit
Analysis based on 11 articles · First reported Feb 10, 2026 · Last updated Feb 10, 2026
The dismissal of the United States===United States Department of Justice's lawsuit against United States===Michigan reinforces states' control over their voter data, potentially reducing uncertainty around election administration and data privacy. This outcome may be viewed positively by those concerned about federal overreach into state election processes.
A federal judge in United States===Michigan, Hala Y. Jarbou, dismissed a lawsuit filed by the United States===United States Department of Justice that sought to obtain United States===Michigan's detailed voter rolls. This decision marks another judicial rejection of the Donald Trump administration's widespread attempts to access sensitive voter data from various states. The United States===United States Department of Justice argued that the information was necessary for election security and maintaining accurate voter registrations, citing the Civil Rights Act of 1960, the National Voter Registration Act of 1993, and the Help America Vote Act of 2022. However, Judge Jarbou ruled that these laws do not require the disclosure of the records sought and warned that forcing such disclosure could unconstitutionally burden the right to vote. United States===Michigan officials, including Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson, had resisted the demand, citing state and federal privacy laws. Similar lawsuits by the United States===United States Department of Justice have also been dismissed in United States===Oregon, United States===California, and United States===Georgia (U.S. state).
Set up alerts, explore entity relationships, search across thousands of events, and build custom intelligence feeds.
Open Dashboard