This event is archived. Final snapshot from when the story concluded. View on Dashboard
Regulatory textbook withdrawal

India NCERT Withdraws Class 8 Textbook

Analysis based on 50 articles · First reported Feb 25, 2026 · Last updated Feb 26, 2026

Sentiment
-20
Attention
2
Articles
50
Market Impact
General
Live prominence charts, article sentiment distribution, and event development timeline available on the NewsDesk Dashboard

The event has a minor negative impact on the education sector due to the controversy surrounding the India===National Council of Educational Research and Training's textbook. It also reinforces the perceived independence and authority of the India===Supreme Court of India, which could be seen as a positive for institutional stability.

Education Government

The India===National Council of Educational Research and Training (NCERT) withdrew its newly released Class 8 Social Science textbook, 'Exploring Society: India and Beyond, Volume II,' after strong objections from the India===Supreme Court of India, the India===Ministry of Education (India), and legal experts. The controversy stemmed from Chapter 4, 'The Role of Judiciary in Our Society,' which discussed corruption, case backlogs, and judge shortages within the judiciary. Chief Justice Surya Kant took suo motu cognisance of the issue, stating that the judiciary's credibility would not be undermined and termed the episode a possible 'deep conspiracy.' Senior advocates Kapil Sibal and Abhishek Singhvi also raised concerns. Union Education Minister Dharmendra Pradhan publicly criticized the India===National Council of Educational Research and Training and supported the India===Supreme Court of India's observations, directing the withdrawal of all copies and promising action against responsible officials, including India===National Council of Educational Research and Training Director Dinesh Prasad Saklani. The India===National Council of Educational Research and Training apologized, calling the error unintentional, and announced that the chapter would be rewritten for the 2026-27 academic session.

govactor
The India===Supreme Court of India took suo motu cognisance of the textbook issue, strongly objecting to the chapter on judicial corruption. Its swift action led to the withdrawal of the book and a directive for accountability, reinforcing its authority and integrity.
Importance 95 Sentiment 70
govactor
The India===National Council of Educational Research and Training (NCERT) faced strong criticism and was forced to withdraw its Class 8 Social Science textbook due to a controversial chapter on judicial corruption. This incident has led to an internal review and a public apology, impacting its credibility.
Importance 90 Sentiment -50
per
Chief Justice Surya Kant took suo motu cognisance of the issue, expressing strong disapproval of the textbook's content and asserting that the judiciary's credibility would not be undermined. His decisive actions were instrumental in the book's withdrawal.
Importance 80 Sentiment 60
govactor
The India===Ministry of Education (India), through Union Education Minister Dharmendra Pradhan, publicly criticized the India===National Council of Educational Research and Training and supported the India===Supreme Court of India's observations. It directed the withdrawal of the book and promised action against responsible officials, asserting governmental oversight.
Importance 70 Sentiment 30
per
Union Education Minister Dharmendra Pradhan publicly criticized the India===National Council of Educational Research and Training and supported the India===Supreme Court of India's observations, calling them 'very agreeable'. He directed the withdrawal of all copies and promised action against officials responsible.
Importance 60 Sentiment 30
per
Senior advocate Kapil Sibal raised concerns about the textbook's content before the Chief Justice, highlighting the negative impact on the judiciary's reputation. His intervention contributed to the India===Supreme Court of India taking swift action.
Importance 50 Sentiment 20
per
Senior advocate Abhishek Singhvi, alongside Kapil Sibal, brought the controversial textbook chapter to the attention of the Chief Justice, emphasizing the selective focus on judicial corruption. His advocacy supported the India===Supreme Court of India's decision to intervene.
Importance 50 Sentiment 20
+ 6 more entities View on Dashboard
NEWSDESK
Track this event live

Set up alerts, explore entity relationships, search across thousands of events, and build custom intelligence feeds.

Open Dashboard

About NewsDesk

NewsDesk is a news intelligence platform that converts raw news articles into structured data. It tracks events, entities, and the relationships between them, with sentiment and attention metrics derived from thousands of articles. Pages on this site are daily static snapshots from the platform's live database. For real-time tracking, search, and alerts, the full dashboard is at app.newsdesk.dev.