Delhi HC Stays CBI Remarks, Defers PMLA
Analysis based on 10 articles · First reported Mar 09, 2026 · Last updated Mar 09, 2026
The India===Delhi High Court's decision to stay adverse remarks against the India===Central Bureau of Investigation and defer the Prevention of Money Laundering Act case indicates a prolonged legal battle, which could maintain uncertainty around the individuals and policies involved. This development suggests that the market will continue to monitor the legal proceedings for potential impacts on governance and regulatory frameworks.
The India===Delhi High Court has stayed adverse remarks made against the India===Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) and its investigating officer in a trial court's order that discharged all 23 accused in the Delhi Excise Policy case. The High Court also directed the trial court to defer proceedings in a connected Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) case until further hearings. This decision came during an appeal filed by the CBI, which argued that the trial court's discharge order amounted to an 'acquittal without trial' and misapplied legal principles. The case involves allegations that the now-withdrawn Delhi Excise Policy 2021-22 was designed to provide undue benefits to private licensees, leading to alleged kickbacks and financial losses for the Delhi government. Among the discharged accused are former Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal and former Deputy Chief Minister Manish Sisodia.
Set up alerts, explore entity relationships, search across thousands of events, and build custom intelligence feeds.
Open Dashboard