Save LBI Warns Against SPEED Act
Analysis based on 7 articles · First reported Mar 19, 2026 · Last updated Mar 19, 2026
The warning regarding the SPEED Act could increase uncertainty for industries reliant on environmental permitting, particularly offshore wind, due to potential legal challenges and delays. If the bill passes in its current form, it could weaken environmental protections, potentially leading to long-term environmental and economic consequences.
Robert Stern (philosopher), President of Save Long Beach Island Advocacy and former manager of the Office of National Environmental Policy Act Affairs for the U.S. Department of Energy, issued a strong warning against the Senate's consideration of the Standardized Permitting and Expediting Economic Development (SPEED) Act. Stern argues that while the bill is framed as 'permitting reform,' it is a dangerous overreach that threatens American environmental law and the constitutional separation of powers. Save Long Beach Island Advocacy, with attorney Thomas Stavola Jr., highlighted that the SPEED Act would limit the scope of environmental reviews, eliminate cumulative impact assessments, and conflict with established case law and the Administrative Procedure Act. They also noted that provisions in the bill conflict with the U.S. Supreme Court's Chevron deference reversal ruling and impinge on Article III judicial authority. The organization is urging Senators Sheldon Whitehouse and Martin Heinrich to exercise caution and consider their markup of the bill to achieve permitting reform while preserving environmental protections.
Set up alerts, explore entity relationships, search across thousands of events, and build custom intelligence feeds.
Open Dashboard