Delhi High Court Rejects Kejriwal's Recusal Plea
Analysis based on 12 articles · First reported Apr 20, 2026 · Last updated Apr 20, 2026
The rejection of Arvind Kejriwal's recusal plea by the India===Delhi High Court ensures the continuation of the excise policy case, which could have implications for the India===Aam Aadmi Party and its leaders. This decision reinforces judicial independence and may reduce uncertainty regarding the legal proceedings.
The India===Delhi High Court, through Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma, rejected Arvind Kejriwal's plea seeking her recusal from the alleged Delhi Excise Policy case. The court ruled that allegations of bias were unsubstantiated and based on mere apprehension, not cogent material. Justice Sharma emphasized the importance of institutional integrity and cautioned against undermining the judiciary with perception-based claims. The decision allows the Central Bureau of Investigation's criminal revision petition, challenging the discharge of Arvind Kejriwal and others, to proceed before Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma's bench. The court also addressed arguments regarding the judge's participation in events and the professional engagements of her family members, finding no direct nexus to the case. This ruling underscores the judiciary's resolve to decide such accusations on their merits.
Set up alerts, explore entity relationships, search across thousands of events, and build custom intelligence feeds.
Open Dashboard