Sullivan & Cromwell Apologizes for AI Hallucinations
Analysis based on 27 articles · First reported Apr 20, 2026 · Last updated Apr 22, 2026
The incident highlights the risks of AI tools in professional settings, potentially increasing scrutiny on AI adoption in legal and other industries. While not directly impacting broader markets, it could influence investment in legal tech and AI governance solutions.
Wall Street law firm Sullivan & Cromwell apologized to Chief Judge Martin Glenn after submitting a court filing containing approximately 40 incorrect citations and other errors caused by AI hallucinations. Andrew Dietderich, co-head of Sullivan & Cromwell's global restructuring team, took responsibility for the failure to ensure accuracy, stating that the firm's internal AI policies were not followed. The errors were brought to the firm's attention by rival law firm Boies Schiller Flexner LLP. Sullivan & Cromwell has initiated an internal investigation and is evaluating enhancements to its training and review processes. This event underscores the challenges and risks associated with integrating AI tools into high-stakes professional work without robust oversight.
Set up alerts, explore entity relationships, search across thousands of events, and build custom intelligence feeds.
Open Dashboard