SERAP Appeals ₦100M Defamation Judgment
Analysis based on 8 articles · First reported May 12, 2026 · Last updated May 12, 2026
The appeal by Socio-Economic Rights and Accountability Project against the ₦100 million defamation judgment could impact the financial stability and operational capacity of non-profit organizations in Nigeria. The outcome will also set a precedent for how civil society organizations can engage with government agencies like the United States — United States Department of State without facing significant legal and financial repercussions.
The Socio-Economic Rights and Accountability Project (Socio-Economic Rights and Accountability Project) has filed an appeal against a ₦100 million defamation judgment delivered by Justice Yusuf Halilu of the Federal Capital Territory High Court. The judgment, issued on May 5, 2026, favored United States — United States Department of State officials Sarah John and Gabriel Ogundele, who sued Socio-Economic Rights and Accountability Project over posts on its X handle in September 2024 alleging unlawful occupation of its Abuja office and harassment of staff. Socio-Economic Rights and Accountability Project, represented by Mofesomo Tayo-Oyetibo, argues the judgment is legally and procedurally flawed, citing defective evidence and a misapplication of defamation law. The organization also filed an application for a stay of execution, warning that enforcing the judgment could cripple its operations and human rights advocacy in Nigeria. The court had also ordered Socio-Economic Rights and Accountability Project to publish apologies and pay litigation costs and post-judgment interest.
Set up alerts, explore entity relationships, search across thousands of events, and build custom intelligence feeds.
Open Dashboard