Upstart Holdings Faces AI Model Lawsuits
Analysis based on 108 articles · First reported Apr 09, 2026 · Last updated Jun 08, 2026
The multiple class action lawsuits against Upstart Holdings for alleged securities fraud have a significant negative impact on the company's stock price and investor confidence. The allegations regarding the overstated accuracy and negative impact of its Model 22 AI on revenue guidance suggest potential financial liabilities and reputational damage for Upstart Holdings.
Multiple law firms, including Rosen Law Firm, Pomerantz LLP, The Schall Law Firm, Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC, Faruqi & Faruqi, Bragar Eagel & Squire, and DJS Law Group, have filed or are encouraging investors to join class action lawsuits against Upstart Holdings. These lawsuits allege that Upstart Holdings made false and misleading statements regarding its proprietary AI lending model, Model 22, between May 14, 2025, and November 4, 2025. Specifically, the complaints claim that Model 22 frequently overreacted to negative macroeconomic signals, leading to an overstatement of its accuracy and propensity to increase loan approval rates. This allegedly resulted in an overly conservative assessment of credit and macroeconomic conditions, negatively impacting Upstart Holdings' revenue and rendering its full-year 2025 revenue guidance unreliable. The truth reportedly emerged on November 4, 2025, when Upstart Holdings reported disappointing Q3 2025 financial results and negatively revised its FY 2025 revenue guidance, blaming Model 22's 'overreaction' to macroeconomic signals. Following these disclosures, Upstart Holdings' stock price fell significantly. Investors have until June 8, 2026, to apply to be appointed as lead plaintiff in these lawsuits.
Set up alerts, explore entity relationships, search across thousands of events, and build custom intelligence feeds.
Open Dashboard