Snapshot from Jun 25, 2026 at 22:38 UTC. For live data and tracking: View Live
Domestic court ruling

Delhi HC Upholds 'Right to Be Forgotten'

Analysis based on 20 articles · First reported Jun 01, 2026 · Last updated Jun 02, 2026

Sentiment
20
Attention
4
Articles
20
Market Impact
Direct
Live prominence charts, article sentiment distribution, and event development timeline available on the NewsDesk Dashboard

The ruling by the India — Delhi High Court establishes a significant legal precedent for digital privacy in India, potentially increasing compliance costs for search engine operators like Alphabet Inc. and legal databases such as Indian Kanoon. While it enhances individual privacy rights, it may also lead to ongoing legal challenges and adjustments in how online information is managed and accessed, impacting the broader internet services and information technology industries.

Legal Services Internet Services Information Technology

The India — Delhi High Court has delivered a landmark judgment recognizing the 'right to be forgotten' as an integral part of the fundamental right to privacy under Article 21 of the Constitution of India. The court ruled that search engines like Alphabet Inc.'s Google and legal database platforms such as Indian Kanoon cannot perpetually display judicial records in name-based searches for cases that are private, or have resulted in acquittal, discharge, quashing, or settlement. The ruling mandates de-indexing and disabling of name-based search functionality for such records, with the India — Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology directed to ensure compliance within two weeks. The court clarified that this right is not absolute, refusing relief in cases involving public figures, crimes against women or children, or breaches of public trust. This decision aims to protect individuals from endless reputational harm caused by digital records, balancing informational privacy with the principle of open justice.

govactor
The India — Delhi High Court delivered a landmark judgment recognizing the 'right to be forgotten' as part of the right to privacy, directing search engines and legal databases to de-index certain judicial records.
Importance 100 Sentiment 30
stock
Alphabet Inc., through its Google search engine, is directly impacted by the ruling as it is mandated to de-index name-based search results for certain judicial records, potentially affecting its search functionality and revenue generation from associated advertising.
Importance 90 Sentiment -15
oth
Indian Kanoon>>>, a legal database platform, is directed by the India — Delhi High Court>>> to restrict name-based search functionality for petitioners' records. This impacts its service offering and data accessibility.
Importance 80 Sentiment -10
govactor
The India — Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology is directed to ensure compliance with the India — Delhi High Court's ruling by search engine operators and intermediaries, solidifying its role in digital regulation.
Importance 70 Sentiment 10
per
Justice Sachin Datta delivered the significant judgment, observing that privacy in the digital age is about an individual's control over personal information dissemination.
Importance 70 Sentiment 60
cnt
India's legal framework is significantly advanced by this ruling, establishing a precedent for digital privacy and the 'right to be forgotten' within its constitutional rights.
Importance 60 Sentiment 20
per
Arvind Nigam appeared on behalf of Alphabet Inc. in the petitions heard by the India — Delhi High Court.
Importance 40 Sentiment 20
per
Rohit Madan was one of the advocates who appeared in the lead matter of the petitions heard by the India — Delhi High Court.
Importance 30 Sentiment 20
per
Akash Vajpai was one of the advocates who appeared in the lead matter of the petitions heard by the India — Delhi High Court.
Importance 30 Sentiment 20
per
Akhil Sibal was among the senior advocates who addressed the India — Delhi High Court in the connected cases.
Importance 30 Sentiment 20
per
P. P. Madhva was refused relief by the court for de-indexing in a sexual offense case settlement, as he was deemed a public figure with continuing public interest in his proceedings.
Importance 20 Sentiment -5
per
Ashutosh Kaushik's plea for removal of past conduct records was declined, as the court stated the 'right to be forgotten' is not for selective erasure of a public figure's past.
Importance 20 Sentiment -5
priv
X Corp. was mentioned as an intermediary that countered the petitioners' arguments, stating it merely facilitates access to public information.
Importance 10 Sentiment -10
priv
The Indian Express digital was involved in a related Supreme Court case where a India — Delhi High Court order to remove reports was stayed, highlighting ongoing legal challenges for media organizations regarding content removal.
Importance 10 Sentiment -5
govactor
The India — Enforcement Directorate was mentioned in the context of a money laundering investigation, where its press releases formed the basis of news reports that were later subject to a de-indexing dispute.
Importance 5 Sentiment 0
NEWSDESK
Track this event live

Set up alerts, explore entity relationships, search across thousands of events, and build custom intelligence feeds.

Open Dashboard

About NewsDesk

NewsDesk is a news intelligence platform that converts raw news articles into structured data. It tracks events, entities, and the relationships between them, with sentiment and attention metrics derived from thousands of articles. Pages on this site are daily static snapshots from the platform's live database. For real-time tracking, search, and alerts, the full dashboard is at app.newsdesk.dev.