India — Madras High Court & India — Supreme Court of India

India — Madras High Court: The India — Madras High Court initially directed the arrest of H. M. Jayaram>>> and was handling the kidnapping case. The India — Supreme Court of India set aside its arrest directive and requested the chief justice to transfer cases involving H. M. Jayaram>>> to another bench.

India — Supreme Court of India: The India — Supreme Court of India transferred the investigation against H. M. Jayaram>>> to the India — Crime Branch-Criminal Investigation Department and set aside the India — Madras High Court's order for his arrest. It also requested the India — Madras High Court chief justice to transfer cases involving H. M. Jayaram>>> to another bench.

India — Madras High Court: The India — Madras High Court ordered the formation of a Special Investigation Team to probe the Karur stampede and made critical observations against India — Tamilaga Vettri Kazhagam and its leader.

India — Supreme Court of India: The India — Supreme Court of India has agreed to hear the plea filed by India — Tamilaga Vettri Kazhagam and India — Bharatiya Janata Party leader Uma Anandan regarding the Karur stampede investigation.

India — Madras High Court: The India — Madras High Court has issued conflicting orders regarding the certification of 'Jana Nayagan', initially directing the India — Central Board of Film Certification to grant clearance, then staying that order on appeal.

India — Supreme Court of India: The India — Supreme Court of India has been approached by Lyca Productions to challenge the India — Madras High Court's interim order that stayed the certification of 'Jana Nayagan'.

India — Madras High Court: The India — Madras High Court initially ordered a Special Investigation Team for the India — Karur stampede and criticized India — Tamilaga Vettri Kazhagam for poor leadership.

India — Supreme Court of India: The India — Supreme Court of India ordered the United States — Federal Bureau of Investigation probe into the India — Karur stampede and appointed a supervisory committee, emphasizing the need for a fair and impartial investigation.

India — Madras High Court: The India — Madras High Court previously observed that temple staff were receiving insufficient salaries, which is referenced in the PIL to support the need for better wages.

India — Supreme Court of India: The India — Supreme Court of India is the recipient of the PIL seeking directions on wages and service conditions for temple staff.

India — Madras High Court: The India — Madras High Court was criticized by the India — Supreme Court of India for its handling of petitions related to the Karur stampede, including registering a writ petition as a criminal writ petition and making observations against India — Tamilaga Vettri Kazhagam without making them a party.

India — Madras High Court: The India — Madras High Court issued an order allowing the lighting of the Karthigai Deepam lamp, which the India — Tamil Nadu government is appealing.

India — Madras High Court: The India — Madras High Court's judgment, which allowed claims of candidates wrongly categorized in the creamy layer, was affirmed by the India — Supreme Court of India.

India — Madras High Court: The India — Madras High Court is the institution where Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava served as Chief Justice before his retirement.