India — Supreme Court of India & B. V. Nagarathna

India — Supreme Court of India: The India — Supreme Court of India delivered a split verdict on Section 17A of the Prevention of Corruption Act, leading to the matter being referred to a larger bench for a final decision.

B. V. Nagarathna: Justice B. V. Nagarathna ruled that Section 17A of the Prevention of Corruption Act is unconstitutional, arguing it forecloses inquiry and protects the corrupt.

India — Supreme Court of India: The India — Supreme Court of India is hearing petitions related to discrimination against women at religious places and the ambit of religious freedom, making observations about Hinduism.

B. V. Nagarathna: B. V. Nagarathna is a Justice on the nine-judge bench and made key observations defining Hinduism as a way of life.

India — Supreme Court of India: The India — Supreme Court of India made observations regarding the misuse of Public Interest Litigations (PILs), highlighting concerns about their transformation into 'Private Interest Litigation', 'Publicity Interest Litigation', 'Paisa Interest Litigation', and 'Political Interest Litigation'.

B. V. Nagarathna: B. V. Nagarathna, a Justice on the India — Supreme Court of India, emphasized that PILs are for the general public and not for articles written in newspapers, further elaborating on the misuse of PILs.

India — Supreme Court of India: The India — Supreme Court of India, specifically a nine-judge Constitution Bench, is hearing petitions related to discrimination against women at religious places, including the Sabarimala temple, and is tasked with determining the scope of religious freedom.

B. V. Nagarathna: B. V. Nagarathna is a Justice on the Constitution bench who expressed apprehension that sectarian restrictions could negatively affect Hinduism and divide society.

B. V. Nagarathna: Justice B. V. Nagarathna, a member of the bench, made several key observations and suggestions regarding the consensual nature of the relationship and the possibility of settlement.

B. V. Nagarathna: Justice B. V. Nagarathna was part of the bench that issued the ruling, highlighting the difficult moral and legal questions involved in such cases.