Surya Kant & B. V. Nagarathna

Surya Kant: Surya Kant is the Chief Justice of India and heads the nine-judge constitution bench making observations on Hinduism.

B. V. Nagarathna: B. V. Nagarathna is a Justice on the nine-judge bench and made key observations defining Hinduism as a way of life.

Surya Kant: Chief Justice of India Surya Kant will form a larger bench to hear the matter again for a final decision, following the split verdict.

B. V. Nagarathna: Justice B. V. Nagarathna ruled that Section 17A of the Prevention of Corruption Act is unconstitutional, arguing it forecloses inquiry and protects the corrupt.

Surya Kant: Surya Kant, as Chief Justice of India, was part of the nine-judge Constitution bench that questioned the objective of the Indian Young Lawyers Association's PIL and remarked that such PILs should have been dismissed.

B. V. Nagarathna: B. V. Nagarathna, a Justice on the India — Supreme Court of India, emphasized that PILs are for the general public and not for articles written in newspapers, further elaborating on the misuse of PILs.

Surya Kant: Surya Kant is the Chief Justice heading the nine-judge Constitution Bench of the India — Supreme Court of India that is hearing the Sabarimala temple case.

B. V. Nagarathna: B. V. Nagarathna is a Justice on the Constitution bench who expressed apprehension that sectarian restrictions could negatively affect Hinduism and divide society.