SERAP Defamation Lawsuit and Appeal
Analysis based on 20 articles · First reported May 05, 2026 · Last updated May 07, 2026
The event highlights potential risks to civic freedoms and freedom of expression in Nigeria, which could deter non-governmental organizations like Socio-Economic Rights and Accountability Project from engaging in anti-corruption advocacy. This could indirectly affect investor confidence in Nigeria by raising concerns about governance and the rule of law.
The Nigeria — Federal Capital Territory (Nigeria) High Court ordered Socio-Economic Rights and Accountability Project to pay N100 million in damages to two United States — United States Department of State officials, Sarah John and Gabriel Ogundele, for defamation. The court also mandated public apologies and litigation costs. Socio-Economic Rights and Accountability Project has rejected the judgment, calling it 'seriously flawed' and a 'travesty' that undermines civic space in Nigeria. The organization, represented by lawyers Mofesomo Tayo-Oyetibo and Ebun-Olu Adegboruwa, plans to appeal the decision, arguing it is a strategic lawsuit against public participation (SLAPP) designed to suppress legitimate human rights advocacy. The United States — United States Department of State clarified that the suit was filed by its operatives in their personal capacity, not by the agency itself, and expressed satisfaction with the court's ruling. The lawsuit originated from a September 2024 post by Socio-Economic Rights and Accountability Project alleging unlawful invasion of its Abuja office after it called on Bola Tinubu to probe alleged corruption in the NNPC and reverse fuel price increases.
Set up alerts, explore entity relationships, search across thousands of events, and build custom intelligence feeds.
Open Dashboard